[Solar-talk] Re: [Solar-svn] Revision 3037 (a.k.a page black-list)

[Antti Holvikari]

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jeff Surgeson <solar at 3hex.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
>  After reading yours and Antti's emails about this (aka page black list) sorry
>  should have replied to this and not started a separate thread
>
>  You say and I quote from your email
>
>
>  >> As it is now, the front-controller *should* send all unrecognized
>  >> requests to the default controller.  The only time _notFound() is
>  >> invoked is if the default controller can't be found.  Is it not
>  >> behaving this way?  I may have messed up the logic moving things
>  >> around.
>
>  This is not quite the way it works, unrecognized requests invoke _notFound()
>  no matter what.
>
>  In my humble opinion in a production environment if a controller or action is
>  not found forwarding to the default controller and default action is
>  preferable to a error page. I accept that in the event of no default
>  controller and action it needs to forward it to a error page.

Just to be clear, are you talking about page controller's _notFound()
or front controller's _notFound()?

My bet is that the _notFound() is invoked in your page class and not
in the front-controller. And this is the way it is supposed to.

Hope I'm not missing anything here.

-- 
Antti Holvikari <http://anttih.com>