[Solar-talk] Re: [Solar-svn] Revision 3037 (a.k.a page black-list)

[Leo Chiao]

I'm guessing that the quick fix for those of us who aren't using the trunk
is to create a route that maps 'base' to our default page controller?

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjones at paul-m-jones.com>
wrote:

>
> On Mar 23, 2008, at 04:53 , Antti Holvikari wrote:
>
> >> Before (or originally):  "/base" invokes Solar_App_Base (or
> >> Vendor_App_Base).  Bad plan as we all agree.  ;-)
> >>
> >> After (or the "*new* new" proposal): "/base" becomes "/default/base",
> >> basically getting converted to an action on the default controller.
> >>
> >> Hope that helps clarify the tradeoff.
> >>
> >> Further thoughts?
> >
> > Nah, I think this is fine :-)
>
> OK cool.  The change is now in SVN, rev 3040.  Let me know if you have
> any trouble.
>
>
> -- pmj
>
> _______________________________________________
> Solar-talk mailing list
> Solar-talk at lists.solarphp.com
> http://mailman-mail3.webfaction.com/listinfo/solar-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-mail3.webfaction.com/pipermail/solar-talk/attachments/20080323/4b292077/attachment-0001.html