[Solar-talk] Re: [Solar-svn] Revision 3037 (a.k.a page black-list)

[Antti Holvikari]

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjones at paul-m-jones.com> wrote:
> Hi Antti,
>
>  > Yes, this is what I was after. Not 100% sure though if turning
>  > "/base/foo/bar" to "/something/base/foo/bar" would not cause
>  > "inconveniences".
>
>  I don't *think* it will.  Let me play it out here, before/after:
>
>  Before (or originally):  "/base" invokes Solar_App_Base (or
>  Vendor_App_Base).  Bad plan as we all agree.  ;-)
>
>  After (or the "*new* new" proposal): "/base" becomes "/default/base",
>  basically getting converted to an action on the default controller.
>
>  Hope that helps clarify the tradeoff.
>
>  Further thoughts?

Nah, I think this is fine :-)

-- 
Antti Holvikari <http://anttih.com>