[Solar-talk] Re: [Solar-svn] Revision 3037 (a.k.a page black-list)

[Paul M Jones]

Hi Antti,

>> For example, say your default is "something", and that the "base"  
>> name
>> is disabled.  If a request is for "/base/foo/bar", that would then go
>> to "/something/base/foo/bar" and be handled by the "something"
>> _notFound().  That is, the default controller will receive all
>> "disabled" page names as if they were actions on the default
>> controller.  (Hope that made sense.)
>>
>> Does that seem like it might give you what you need?
>
> Yes, this is what I was after. Not 100% sure though if turning
> "/base/foo/bar" to "/something/base/foo/bar" would not cause
> "inconveniences".

I don't *think* it will.  Let me play it out here, before/after:

Before (or originally):  "/base" invokes Solar_App_Base (or  
Vendor_App_Base).  Bad plan as we all agree.  ;-)

After (or the "*new* new" proposal): "/base" becomes "/default/base",  
basically getting converted to an action on the default controller.

Hope that helps clarify the tradeoff.

Further thoughts?



-- pmj