[Solar-talk] Toward a Standard Project Structure

[Kilbride, James P.]

Ahh as long as it's only the 'public' that makes more sense but the
comment about symlinks on windows is very well taken. I've had very
mixed luck doing symlinks with windows so I really dont' like the idea
of them yet I don't see anyway around them. Cest la vie.

James Kilbride 

-----Original Message-----
From: solar-talk-bounces at lists.solarphp.com
[mailto:solar-talk-bounces at lists.solarphp.com] On Behalf Of Paul M Jones
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 4:14 PM
To: solar-talk at lists.solarphp.com
Subject: Re: [Solar-talk] Toward a Standard Project Structure


On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:58 , Kilbride, James P. wrote:

> Do we really want to put the application source(Vendor/App/Whatever) 
> in the actual web doc root?

Oh no, not at all.  The idea is that the system structure lives in SVN
somewhere and gets checked out or exported to the target machine, to a
non-web directory.  Then you point the webserver to the trunk/docroot,
so that the web server itself only sees those files.

Hope that helps explain a little more, let me know if it does now.


-- pmj

_______________________________________________
Solar-talk mailing list
Solar-talk at lists.solarphp.com
http://mailman-mail3.webfaction.com/listinfo/solar-talk