[Solar-talk] Toward a Standard Project Structure

[Paul M Jones]

On Feb 29, 2008, at 09:01 , Antti Holvikari wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Paul M Jones <pmjones at paul-m-jones.com 
> > wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I think I've talked about this before, and want to bring it up again
>> for further discussion.
>
> I've setup all my projects exactly like this. Works really well and
> I'd strongly recommend what you suggest. I also want to point out that
> the "source" dir works perfectly for git submodules as well.

The "git" point is an excellent one ...


> In addition, I've separated the docroot into different "environments"
> like local, dev and production. These dirs can be symlinked to,
> depending on the environment. I even have an environment for
> "unavailable". It allows me to make a simple "ln -s" to put my site
> into a "site is being updated" or a "something is wrong" state.

... as is this one.  Very good.


> Ps. Didn't we already agree with this setup?

We may have, I didn't see it in my mailbox archive files. As I recall,  
in the previous discussion, I used different names for the  
directories, and didn't have a `source` directory all.  ;-)

I suppose the next thing to do is to put it on the wiki.  Yay wiki!  :-)


-- pmj