[Solar-talk] Move Solar.php to Solar/Solar.php ?

[Clay Loveless]

On Sep 5, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Clay Loveless wrote:

> On Sep 5, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Paul M Jones wrote:
>
>> Nitpick: it's an "arch" class, not a "base" class.  ;-)
> ...
>> Even so, moving *some* of the arch-class functions (e.g., the file- 
>> related ones) to their own class does make sense to me.  But that  
>> doesn't help with the original point; i.e., how best to help out  
>> the svn:externals folks.
>
> Ok -- How about arch.php? (Or 'Arch.php'?)
>
> Option 1:
> Since we're talking about making an exception to the naming  
> conventions anyway, I would be in favor of something like this:
>
> include 'Solar/arch.php';
> Solar::start();
>
>
> ... where arch.php is a logical name for the file (makes more sense  
> than 'Solar/Solar.php'), and rather than defining a 'Solar_Arch'  
> class, it's just the 'Solar' arch class.
>
> Option 2:
> I could also see 'Arch.php' defining Solar_Arch, but Solar_Arch  
> "sets up" or otherwise returns a 'Solar' class that is a  
> convenience handle, of sorts.
>
> Option 3:
> Or, stick with Solar_Arch throughout -- it's fewer keystrokes than  
> 'Solar_Framework'. :)


... so was this a big flop? Or are people still thinking about these  
options/suggestions?

Just curious. :)

--
Killersoft.com