[Solar-talk] Move Solar.php to Solar/Solar.php ?
Paul M Jones
pmjones at ciaweb.net
Thu Sep 6 07:55:33 CDT 2007
On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Travis Swicegood wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Clay Loveless wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 5, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Paul M Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On initial consideration, I'm not sure that we *can* get rid of
>>> it. Solar::factory() and Solar::dependency() and Solar::registry
>>> (), for example, are key underpinnings. Having to type a longer
>>> prefix class-name would be a bit of a hassle. (Yes, I know that
>>> "more to type" is not a good reason, but still.)
>>
>> Yeah, that would be a bit irritating ... but the benefits of being
>> able to more easily unit test a base class that didn't rely on
>> static methods might outweigh the burden of extra typing.
>
> That sounds like something I might have said... ;-)
>
>
> As far as typing Solar_Framework::factory(), would you actually be
> doing that if you're relying on autoload code?
The factory() method is used to create new objects, not (primarily)
to load classes.
--
Paul M. Jones <http://paul-m-jones.com>
Solar: Simple Object Library and Application Repository
for PHP5. <http://solarphp.com>
Join the Solar community wiki! <http://solarphp.org>
Savant: The simple, elegant, and powerful solution for
templates in PHP. <http://phpsavant.com>
More information about the Solar-talk
mailing list