[Solar-talk] Move Solar.php to Solar/Solar.php ?
Paul M Jones
pmjones at ciaweb.net
Wed Sep 5 18:21:56 CDT 2007
On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Clay Loveless wrote:
> One thing to consider (perhaps) -- is Solar.php even necessary
> anymore?
>
> With Solar's spl_autoload support, a lot of what's in Solar.php be
> moved into Solar_Base?
>
> I haven't thought that idea through all the way, but this might be
> an opportunity to kill 2 birds with one stone (get rid of the big-
> parent-static-method-thing, and play nice with svn:externals),
> *without* breaking the naming convention.
That's an interesting idea.
On initial consideration, I'm not sure that we *can* get rid of it.
Solar::factory() and Solar::dependency() and Solar::registry(), for
example, are key underpinnings. Having to type a longer prefix class-
name would be a bit of a hassle. (Yes, I know that "more to type"
is not a good reason, but still.)
--
Paul M. Jones <http://paul-m-jones.com>
Solar: Simple Object Library and Application Repository
for PHP5. <http://solarphp.com>
Join the Solar community wiki! <http://solarphp.org>
Savant: The simple, elegant, and powerful solution for
templates in PHP. <http://phpsavant.com>
More information about the Solar-talk
mailing list