[Solar-talk] Performance ideas

[Rodrigo Moraes]

On 10/16/07, Richard Thomas wrote:
> yea looking at your code made me remember my last thought.. intergrate caching..
>
> For example theres no reason to process the same url over and over
> again, when you can cache the url and the final processed route.

hmm, just a quick note. I'm not sure if the "route caching" should be
kept - actually I want to remove it since a little while after it was
added. it was an idea that seemed cool for a moment and I implemented
immediately, but it is ugly (at least as it is), adds complexity and I
have no idea of how much was gained. :P

without it, the controller is much more pure and nice. :)

> Thats one of the problems it seems ZF is having.. They started out
> trying to make there framework so modular that each piece doesn't need
> the other for the most part but now doing something like adding
> caching throughout is a little overwhelming, they want to be able to
> cache things like the table data in there db adapter but can't decide
> how to do it.

I'd just leave it for each specific implementation. 80/20, you know. :)

-- rodrigo