[Solar-talk] Oh and 'Database Support'
Paul M Jones
pmjones at ciaweb.net
Wed Jul 11 16:09:13 CDT 2007
Hiya Kilbride,
> Any Oracle support available yet?? US Navy requires the use of
> Oracle every time I turn around
Fricking swabbies. (This from an ex Zoomie. ;-)
> so if Oracle support isn't available it's going to be a slightly
> tougher sell possibly. (or not if adding it is relatively
> painless). I noticed Oracle isn't listed on the supporting
> databases, but figured that the web pages might not be up to date.
Not yet, sorry. :-( The 30-character limit on entity names (tables,
indexes, etc) makes it difficult for me to write a "portable" adapter
for Oracle that's consistent with the other adapters.
I'm beginning to think that there need to be two "types" or "castes"
of database adapters in Solar: the ones that *can* be made portable
between each other (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Sqlite, perhaps eventually
Derby/DB2 and Interbase/Firebird), and then the ones that are just
too difficult to target for portability (Oracle and Microsoft SQL).
Or perhaps there is some other way of looking at this that I have
missed, happy to hear more discussion on this.
--
Paul M. Jones <http://paul-m-jones.com>
Solar: Simple Object Library and Application Repository
for PHP5. <http://solarphp.com>
Join the Solar community wiki! <http://solarphp.org>
Savant: The simple, elegant, and powerful solution for
templates in PHP. <http://phpsavant.com>
More information about the Solar-talk
mailing list