[Solar-talk] Solar Testing via external test library

Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.moraes at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 10:40:01 PDT 2006


On 10/4/06, Antti Holvikari wrote:
> I *love* simple but powerful solutions, and I think Solar_Test is just
> that. I kinda see no real reasons why to switch to something else.
> Maybe a +0 at this point.

I agree with you on this; I'm a newbie running unit tests but
Solar_Test do its job very well. As I said I'd prefer to use an
external package to free Paul from maintaning Solar_Test. For all of
us this would also mean more focus on "the core", I think.

On 10/4/06, Clay Loveless wrote:
> PHPUnit3 is also the testing framework of choice for most unit-tested
> PEAR packages (that aren't using .phpt), so that's another good
> argument for it ... for those of us maintaining packages in PEAR,
> means we only need to get comfortable with one external testing
> framework.

I observe that PhpUnit (2-3) has, perhaps, a wider adoption in
libraries and applications. From a newbie perspective, I would choose
it for this reason.

rodrigo


More information about the solar-talk mailing list