[Solar-talk] Method-Based Actions
Arnaud Limbourg
arnaud at limbourg.com
Fri Jun 23 23:04:16 PDT 2006
Paul M Jones wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
>
>> I guess one can get used to both prefix and suffix so it boils down to
>> "make it easy for people who use the ZF as well as solar" or "want
>> to be
>> different from the ZF and have a prefix instead of a suffix".
>
> I don't want to be different just to be different; I've no problem
> following an established standard if it makes sense.
Makes sense.
> I'm not seeing a very strong argument on either side (prefix or
> suffix), just that one or the other is necessary to deconflict with
> language constructs..
It is just a matter of preference I guess.
> Because all methods are in the same instance of the same class, they
> all share information to begin with via class properties. Or am I
> missing your point?
I was thinking more in terms of logic that needs to be shared so might
want to implement the code that does that a private method.
Arnaud.
More information about the solar-talk
mailing list